Culling
has hit the headlines recently, and various species have topped the
undesirables list. it seems to be fashionable across the globe to shoot first,
ask questions later. From the Japanese randomly killing dolphins, to
Australians going all out on sharks, I’d like to make a radical proposal to
stop this madness.
In
Norway the new fad is to kill the wolves, despite 80% of population wanting to
keep the species in their high numbers. The problem is with farming: it is
claimed that sheep are killed by these
animals. However, around 1500 out of 2 million Norwegian sheep are killed by
wolves a year, and these small numbers are compensated for. A much higher
proportion of their deaths is predicted to be the result of some dumb sheep
thing like falling down a crevasse. Moreover,
wolves supposedly present a danger to human life. Remarkably, for a somewhat
foreward thinking, humanitarian country, the proposed culling in Norway still
seems to think of the wolf as the big bad creep out of a Brothers Grimm
fairytale. In reality they affect humans very little: no one’s been killed by a
wolf since 1800.

These
animals, which have called Scandinavia their home for thousands of years, are facing
extermination by ignorance and fearmongering. Absurdly, farmers have said the
animal ‘contributes nothing’. Well besides balancing the ecosystem what do you
expect wild animals to contribute to the human world? It’s like saying ‘hamsters
are shit bankers, so to hell with the lot of them’. And quite frankly I think
this statement is rash, existentially wolves may ‘contribute’ more than
economics can measure. If it wasn’t for wolves, what would people get tattooed
to represent their spiriuality? Jokes aside, if people do not pay attention to
this ridiculous occurance its existance will only snowball, and these majestic
creatures will become extinct.
Similarly
the Hufflepuff mascot is being culled by our meat obsession. Not to go all
Morissey on you, but the British badger is effectively being killed so we can
kill other animals. It’s not even working. The aim of the policy is to prevent
TB spread in livestock. The randomised culling however has led to the remaining
badgers spreading to TB areas and catching the disease, so the problem has just
been aggravated. My only suggestion in this line of thinking, for a completely
successful British cattle-farming, is to kill every animal apart from the ones
we want to eat. In fact, kill all the cattle too because 94% of bovine TB
spread is due to herd-to-herd transmission. If we’re going to roll with this
fists first attitude, why not go the whole hog?

One
could argue that it is a survival of the fittest, dog eat dog, world. If the
Dodo was too stupid and fat to survive, that’s not our problem. The issue I
take with this reasoning is that it’s regressive and insulting to humanity:
have we not evolved beyond the carelessness of survival techniques such as
these? Aren’t we intelligent enough to realise when something is destructive –
and what’s more, ineffective – and found a logical and peaceful way around it?
It’s like we haven’t made any progress since we were hairy cavemen and ladies thrusting
spears at woolly mammoths.
To
me, culling is an unnatural, nonsensical and lazy policy which does not belong
in the modern world.
No comments:
Post a Comment